Re: [BULK] - Re: [XHTML2] Spirit of "1.1.3. XHTML 2 and Presentation" (PR#7759)

David Dorward schreef:
>> or specify content types.
> So it would be standard for all XML documents, but not XML documents
> of type application/movie-script+xml? This strikes me as, at best, a
> confusing way to go about things.

Surely Paul meant for such a <script> and <style> element to be in their 
own namespace, e.g. <xml:script> or <css:style> or whatever…? They’re in 
a different namespace, and in a different namespace the meaning can be 
different. Whether in natural language a single word can have multiple 
meanings seems quite irrelevant to me (in other natural languages its 
name means nothing at all, that doesn’t seem to be a problem either), as 
long as it’s not *entirely* unintuitive.


Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!!
Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Website: Backbase employee;

Received on Monday, 20 February 2006 17:37:09 UTC