- From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 18:37:02 +0100
- To: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
David Dorward schreef: >> or specify content types. >> > > So it would be standard for all XML documents, but not XML documents > of type application/movie-script+xml? This strikes me as, at best, a > confusing way to go about things. > Surely Paul meant for such a <script> and <style> element to be in their own namespace, e.g. <xml:script> or <css:style> or whatever…? They’re in a different namespace, and in a different namespace the meaning can be different. Whether in natural language a single word can have multiple meanings seems quite irrelevant to me (in other natural languages its name means nothing at all, that doesn’t seem to be a problem either), as long as it’s not *entirely* unintuitive. ~Grauw -- Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands. Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
Received on Monday, 20 February 2006 17:37:09 UTC