Re: [BULK] - Re: [XHTML2] Spirit of "1.1.3. XHTML 2 and Presentation" (PR#7759)

Paul Mitchell schreef:
> You cover the many issues well, but I have a style criticism.
>
> There's not enough fire and brimstone for the non-techies. Don't be 
> coy. When you say "<strong>As of February 2006, there are still 
> technical problems with this and no formal specification 
> exists</strong>", I'd follow with a translation, which is something 
> like "<h1><blink>IN OTHER WORDS, THIS IS WRONG, HORRIBLY HORRIBLY 
> WRONG! DO THIS AND YOU'LL GET HELL! DON'T SAY YOU WEREN'T 
> WARNED!</blink></h1>". 

For starters, HTML WG, what about removing this from the Appendix C of 
the XHTML 1.0 specification.

Thanks.


~Grauw

-- 
Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.

Received on Monday, 13 February 2006 22:59:15 UTC