- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:15:41 +0100
- To: Kelly <lightsolphoenix@gmail.com>
- Cc: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>, www-style@w3.org
Kelly wrote: > I can't tell you why it's not stated, but the reason for extinction is that > XBL2 can do everything BECSS can do, and then some. So really, BECSS is no > longer necessary. Exactly. And it's not stated yet only because it was recently on WG's agenda, we'll publish something about it as soon as we can. </Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2006 07:15:58 UTC