- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:31:54 -0500
- To: Peter Nederlof <peter.nederlof@lostboys.nl>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Peter Nederlof wrote: > In my opinion you're sending out the wrong message if the argument for > not implementing (or considering) a spec, is that it may be difficult to > implement, and assumed inefficient at best when implemented. The less > there is to support, the faster the system. The fastest implementation > therefore supports next to nothing ... Sure, so it becomes a matter of balance, as I mentioned in my last mail. > As an everyday user of CSS I actually can't fathom why it never made it > to a spec. Now, if only everything in the specs were supported! ;) It never made it into a spec because implementors have thus far said they have no plans to support it. -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 23 August 2006 15:34:27 UTC