- From: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 10:53:18 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
Hello all, in my limited HTML authoring experience I've come across a few situations in which I would have liked to have the possibility to change the style of an element depending on whether it was the /parent/ (or more in general an ancestor) of another element, or to select an element because it was /followed/ by a particular sibling. In other wors, situations where something like E + F or E > F would used to select E instead of F (of course with a different syntax). Admittedly, these situations usually occur where pages aren't perfectly designed (a typical situation is blog platforms where the user can prepare the template for the web pages as he wishes, but the platform also injects some extra HTML). There are however some particular situations where it makes sense also for perfectly legitimate situations. For example, consider a complex web page with multiple sets of radio buttons: it should be possible to style the container of a set of radio buttons where no radio button is checked in a different way, as a reminder that the set still has to be operated by the user. Similarly, when the user must enable at least one but no more than n checkboxes. Say for example that the syntax for selecting the parent is F < E (select an element E that has a child F): then one could use form { ... } for all 'wrong' forms, and then input[type="radio"]:checked < form {...} to select a form with a checked radiobutton, etc. And if this syntax might be allowed in a :not() selector it would be even better input[type="radio"] < form:not(input[type="radio"]:checked < form) { ... } A similar argument could be made for "predecessor" selectors: one may want to style paragraphs in a certain way, but in a different way when they are followed by tables or whatever. Any comments on such a proposal? -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
Received on Sunday, 20 August 2006 02:13:26 UTC