- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:03:56 +1000
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:33:45 -0700, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com> wrote:
>> IMO the binding property is simple and well-specified. I don't really
>> see a need for additional complexity in the CSS syntax.
>
> Note that he's proposing an additional feature, as I understand it. I
> suppose that doing @binding url() will load the binding document and
> than for each binding associate it with the element given in element=""
> attribute.
Yes, that's correct. I have no problem with the 'binding' property,
though I did share Fantasai's concerns about the loops caused by using
:bound-element { binding:none; }.
--
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
Received on Thursday, 17 August 2006 05:04:25 UTC