Re: Proposed ::last-line and ::last-letter selectors

Philip TAYLOR wrote:
> Surely the latter two options /are/ the lesser of the two evils :
> users who choose to use either of the latter two to achieve
> what is generally regarded as a highly undesirable effect clearly
> identify themselves as being neither concerned about standards
> nor concerned about the received wisdom pertaining to the effect
> they are setting out to accomplish.  By incorporating
> "text-decoration: blink" into CSS, the CSS WG are (IMHO)
> sadly giving tacit approval to the effect's use :-(

FWIW, blinking text for text-decoration: blink is optional; it's not
required for conformance to the spec.


Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2006 15:48:55 UTC