- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:30:37 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
Philip TAYLOR wrote: > > Surely the latter two options /are/ the lesser of the two evils : > users who choose to use either of the latter two to achieve > what is generally regarded as a highly undesirable effect clearly > identify themselves as being neither concerned about standards > nor concerned about the received wisdom pertaining to the effect > they are setting out to accomplish. By incorporating > "text-decoration: blink" into CSS, the CSS WG are (IMHO) > sadly giving tacit approval to the effect's use :-( FWIW, blinking text for text-decoration: blink is optional; it's not required for conformance to the spec. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2006 15:48:55 UTC