- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 07:50:30 +0000 (UTC)
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
Hi, Would the CSS community and working group object to the XBL2 specification including the following two CSS features? First, a 'binding' property, defined to take a list of one or more <url>s or the keyword 'none', which would act as a binding mechanism to specify one or more XBL bindings to apply to an element. Second, a pseudo-class ':xbl-bound-element' that matches an XBL bound element. The proposed processing model for these features is described in the XBL specification, which you can find at either of these locations: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xbl/xbl2.html http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/xbl2/Overview.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 Currently the features using the "-xbl-" vendor prefix. It would be nice to not require this. FWIW, I am not aware of any conflicts between these XBL features and the CSS2.1 or Selectors specifications. (The fact that I'm one of the editors of all three makes that statement slightly more relevant! :-) ) Please let me know if there are any objections. The current plan is for XBL2 to go to Last Call sometime around mid-September. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 14 August 2006 07:50:46 UTC