- From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:06:01 +0100 (BST)
- To: Kelly Miller <lightsolphoenix@gmail.com>
- Cc: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, www-style@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Kelly Miller wrote: > --[PinePGP]--------------------------------------------------[begin]-- > > > Dave Raggett wrote: >> >> I am therefore looking for support for direct use of TTF files so >> that I don't have to use a special tool for embedded fonts like >> Weft [1]. There are plenty of fonts with open licenses that are >> perfectly good for most purposes, so a DRM-based solution isn't >> high on my wish list. > > The problem here is that if a user wants the font, what will stop > them from downloading the ttf file? > > IMO, we need a special encrypted format that can be used to encode > fonts on the 'Net, so that downloading and using doesn't work. Microsoft already provides such a solution, which has been widely deployed as part of IE for Windows. As a developer, you can use their free tool "Weft" to create the specially encrypted format. However, it seems to involve too much effort compared with using image replacements, and hasn't caught on. For fonts without restrictions on copying, DRM is an unnecessary pain and a much simpler approach is possible. There are plenty of such fonts that are perfectly good enough for most purposes. For more information on Weft, see: http://www.microsoft.com/typography/web/embedding/weft3/ Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> W3C lead for multimodal interaction http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett +44 1225 866240 (or 867351) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFETkjub3AdEmxAsUsRAvrAAJ4ugPnGBHhj1IB2vhKaaYrOqYlt8gCghPU5 rm7GLiIjpIU3LejaPjVIMq0= =gT70 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 16:06:40 UTC