- From: Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 05:40:29 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-style@w3.org
I have explained why the semantic web will not be bound in the style layer: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Nov/thread.html#123 ...so perhaps the more interesting question forward for this group, is how will styling be done for the semantic web? Specifically reading through all my posts in above thread, we see that the correct layer to bind semantics is in semantic markup, and XAML has a big lead given it has the architecture and will have the client marketshare. So it seems it would be interesting to explore how styling is done in XAML, and think about how CSS might be integrated and what the benefits and tradeoffs will be. In short, what is the future of CSS given the sure dominance of XAML? You may disagree with the premise that XAML will dominate, or that semantic web will be enabled via XML, in which case don't refute it here, but in the linked threads above and below. You may also want to refer to the links I gave in this post for the blogs of Microsoft developers' explanations why they dropped CSS syntax from Avalon/XAML styling: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Nov/0095.html If you are interested in exploring the ramifications of the premise. I suggest this thread as a discussion pad. I will let others read up on XAML styling and come here to compare and contrast. I am not actually going to debate in this thread. I just wanted to seed the discussion by starting this thread. One idea I have is a CSS converter that would convert CSS to XAML <STYLE>s upon rendering or as a pre-processor. I bet you all will come up with better ideas. Perhaps we will even get some ideological noise, e.g. "solution == ignore XAML" :) -- Kind Regards, Shelby Moore http://coolpage.com
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2005 10:40:46 UTC