- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:30:16 -0800
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, <www-style@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> To: <www-style@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 8:27 PM Subject: Re: [CSS21] Status of defult (intrinsic) style sheet in UA >On Tuesday 2005-11-22 20:19 -0800, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: >> From: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu> >> >Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: >> >>If we need all five style systems behave as one table >> >>then why just not to add into >> >>[http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/cascade.html#specificity] >> >>one more "digit" into "a-b-c-d" ? >> > >> >That could indeed be done (and is in fact more or less what the "inline >> >style rule" digit is)... >> >> Yep. For the terms of formal specification this will work better. > >Actually, it won't, since other things such as presentational attributes >and DOM CSS's override style fit themselves in at a certain point in the >weight/order sort. In other words, non-CSS sources of style data fit at >points within that sort, but not within the specificity sort. (And they >should probably be listed there too.) > >-David David, it seems I don't understand something here... "non-CSS sources of style data fit at points within that sort, but not within the specificity sort." Let's say we have "five digits" instead of four for sorting purposes: source-a-b-c-d a-b-c-d - describe specificity source - describe source (group, layer, system) So for "non-CSS sources of style data" we need to select proper constant value for the source to place such group of styles "at points within that sort" where we needed. Or I missed something again? Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2005 19:30:49 UTC