- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:18:43 -0800
- To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: "Simon Pieters" <zcorpan@hotmail.com>, <www-style@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU> | | Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: | > The document you mentioned tells different story: | | Not really, no. | | > "User agent: Conforming user agents must apply a default style sheet (or behave | > as if they did) prior to all other style sheets for a document....." | | Yes. | | > There is no mentioning about the weight or so. | | You didn't read far enough. See section 6.4.1, which says: | | # Sort by importance (normal or important) and origin (author, user, | or user agent). In ascending order: | | 1. user agent style sheets | 2. user normal style sheets | 3. author normal style sheets | 4. author important style sheets | 5. user important style sheets | | > As far as I understand it: these two systems of styles are completely | > independent | | All that happens is that any user or author origin rule automatically | "beats" any ua (not !important) rule. | | > so weights or specificity of their elements are isolated from | > each other. | | Yes, but their interaction is quite well-defined. So I'm not sure what | you want as a clarification here. Well then logic of definition is not clear. These two statements: 1) "User agent: Conforming user agents must apply a default style sheet (or behave as if they did) *prior to all other style sheets* for a document....." 2) "# Sort by importance (normal or important) and origin (author, user, or user agent). In ascending order:...." are conradicting each other. Aren't they? Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2005 00:19:10 UTC