- From: Patrick Lauke <P.H.Lauke@salford.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:47:05 -0000
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
> Kris Vanderwater > I wasn't around 3 years ago so I can't even begin to guess what when > down, or why you seem so bitter. I'm also not going to read through a > battery of 3 year old material to find out why you're so bitter, suffice > it to say, coming here and insulting people because you were right and they were > wrong is... well the height of arrogance. > 2.) As I said before, from a technical standpoint I think we > agree. If what you're trying to say is that style, markup and structure > should all be encapsulated in their own environments that are assembled by the > browser, then yes, we agree completely. I'll echo those two statements: I can't comment on what happened in the past, and the technical argument seems sound enough. However, it doesn't stand much of a chance of being heard/read and given due consideration due the amount of cr*p it comes wrapped up in. Even the most valid of arguments are lost completely if they're only little nuggets of value in a heap of verbal junk and self-aggrandising blabber... P ________________________________ Patrick H. Lauke Web Editor / University of Salford http://www.salford.ac.uk ________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ ________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2005 16:53:50 UTC