- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 21:30:02 -0800
- To: "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "W3C Style List" <www-style@w3.org>
From: "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> > > Ian Hickson wrote: >> On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Felix Miata wrote: >>> Is there a formal procedure to do this? >> >> Yes: Become a W3C member, > > Considering that's a fairly major entry barrier for most people... > >>> Do I simply send an email to this list? >> >> That is the informal procedure. > > Hypothetically speaking, say a really good specification of an original > idea for a new property has been drafted and sent to this list. The spec > clearly describes in great detail about its use cases, how it affects > rendering, how it interacts with other properties, the box model and/or > other relevant sections of the CSS, plus describes how it can be > incrementally rendered, any parsing issues, cascading and inheritence > issues, etc. The author also satisfactorily responds to all questions and > comments raised. > > What are the chances of such a proposal at least being discussed for 5 > minutes (before being rejected) at the next CSSWG meeting? > It is better to ask: "What are main motivations of CSSWG? What are the goals?". This will help you to estimate chances up front. In real life and practical design good specification is a consequence of acceptance of idea in general. Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Thursday, 10 November 2005 05:30:36 UTC