- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 09:24:37 -0800
- To: "Orion Adrian" <orion.adrian@gmail.com>, <www-style@w3.org>
Hi, Orion, > :can-have-focus seems more semantic than :tab-stop Oh, that semantic.... Something tells me that your phrase "more semantic" from semantic point of view just degrade semantical meaning of the semantic as an entitiy :) To be short: what do you mean exactly? Technically speaking: can-have-focus - means: can have a focus but may not *now* accept it. tab-stop - means: this element *now* is 1) "focusable" and 2) "tab-stopable". I cannot imagine situations when you need to designate *all* focusable elements. Example: buttons on the toolbar, they have focus (to be precise toolbar by itself can have a focus ) when you will click on it. But toolbar is out of tab order. What do you want from ":can-have-focus" to select? Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Orion Adrian" <orion.adrian@gmail.com> To: <www-style@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 5:20 AM Subject: Re: ::can-have-focus pseudo-class? > > :can-have-focus seems more semantic than :tab-stop > > On 11/2/05, Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com> wrote: >> >> I am using in my engine >> >> :tab-stop pseudo class for that. >> >> It is not exactly can-have-focus but very close. >> >> :tab-stop means it will accept focus *and* can be reached >> by TAB traversal. Strictly speaking "focusable" >> element is not always "tab-reachable". >> >> Andrew Fedoniouk. >> http://terrainformatica.com >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Martijn" <martijn.martijn@gmail.com> >> To: <www-style@w3.org> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 3:47 PM >> Subject: Re: ::can-have-focus pseudo-class? >> >> >> > >> > On 11/2/05, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >> > >> >> No, because here you have the potential for an actual loop. >> > You're right, I can see the potential for a loop now (and not for the >> > previous case). >> > >> > Regards, >> > Martijn >> > >> > >> >> > > > -- > > Orion Adrian > >
Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:24:45 UTC