- From: Martijn <martijn.martijn@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:09:02 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Sounds like a good idea. But I believe it should then be :can-have(:focus) with one colon, since it is a pseudo-class Maybe a better name would be :can-have-state(:focus) or something. Regards, Martijn On 11/1/05, David Latapie <david@empyree.org> wrote: > > > Le 1 nov. 05 à 16:09, Orion Adrian a écrit : > > > Wouldn't it be more in style to have ::can-have(:focus) > > err... right > > -- > </david_latapie> > blog.empyree.org > > >
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2005 16:09:09 UTC