- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:11:23 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>>> OTOH, img:alt { content: attr(alt) } sounds kinda nice. Though
>>> that wouldn’t work with XHTML 2.0.
>>
>> Why not?
>
> There is no img element in XHTML 2.0.
Heh, ok...
I thought it was intended as a more general pseudo-class as it was
proposed in the light of background image and such... Actually, the
original proposal applied the pseudo-class to the P element.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2005 19:11:57 UTC