- From: Justin Wood <116057@bacon.qcc.mass.edu>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:39:52 -0500
- To: Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:14:51 -0500 Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net> wrote: > >value called "tab". This could be very useful for making >lists look and behave like native tabs, but there's >something I don't understand. Tabs are almost always used >in a group context, yet there is no "tab-group" property >value. Is there a specific reason for this? It would seem >to me that a "tab-group" value would make it easy to >create a tab group with a simple unordered list... > >| ul.tabgroup { appearance: tab-group } >| ul.tabgroup il { appearance: tab } > >....Or perhaps a <div> and some hyperlinks... > >| div.tabgroup { appearance: tab-group } >| div.tabgroup a { appearance: tab } > > Then again, if I understand correctly, |appearance| >doesn't affect >the |display| property. Should this require "tab" and >"tab-group" values for |display|? > > See for reference, the WhatWG concept of "Tabs" as it stands for now (The document is ever changing) http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#section1 Also something by Fantasai when "dared" by Ian to write a current example of "Tab" display capability if it was to be implemented in some way. (Requires JS and good CSS support iirc) http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/style/design/tabs I am far from an authority on this, just thought it would help everyone involved. ~Justin Wood (Callek)
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2005 17:40:28 UTC