- From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 21:06:12 +0200
- To: Kelly Miller <lightsolphoenix@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Kelly Miller wrote: > I'd just like to point out here that most CSS experimentation involves > finding out what IE will do with certain types of code. It's rare > that I run CSS through both Firefox and Opera and find major > differences with how it's interpreted. In fact, 99 out of 100 times, > it'll be interpreted exactly as the CSS standards say, which means I > can visualize it in my head. > > With IE, on the other hand, actually predicting how the system will > treat the code is like tiptoeing through a minefield. IE does some of > the oddest things with CSS I've ever seen, especially when you start > using floats to position objects. > > What you seem to miss here, is that the problem is not that right and > bottom are pointless, but that IE doesn't support right or bottom > correctly. If it did, all CSS would really need is a type of > positioning that can be positioned like position: absolute but that > uses the float model for determining the position of inline objects, > or a type of positioning that in general allows the positioned object > to effect the size of parent elements/sibling elements. Then columns > could be created simply by using top: 0; bottom: 0, and on top of > that, would be totally accessible and NOT dependent on source order at > all (after all, most people surround blocks of content with <div> > elements, and XHTML2's role element will likely be used in the future > for situations like this). Even a grid system could help here, though > IMO it might be better to simply work with the positioning model. > It's not that far off from what it needs to be at this point; and yes, > I agree that min-left, min-right, min-top and min-bottom would help a > lot when it came to using percentages (the last site I designed, I > used ems to size columns because it allowed me to force the gaps to be > a consistent size). Hear hear ^_^. I entirely agree. And I think it would be more constructive if we took the discussion towards improving what is still lacking in the existing model. ~Grauw -- Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands. Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2005 19:06:15 UTC