- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 08:34:20 +0100 (BST)
- To: www-style@w3.org
> for CSS 1.0 renderers? No. Once you finish getting it done, you > package up the renderer as a plugin and ship it with your product so > that when a resource specifies 1.0, it uses the 1.0 renderer. If it That means that content will die when the platforms on which the plug-in run dies. W3C is trying to take a socially responsible position, not just a purely commercial one. One of the problems we have now with technology is that there are a lot of machine readable resources that are no longer machine readable because the hardware and/or software to read them no longer exists. Such decay of the historical record doesn't bother computer and software vendors because buyers don't think in those terms. Many may not even think clearly about statute of limitation terms of around six or sever years (UK tax records). One has to assume that commercial products can disappear very quickly (product is no longer profitable, company goes out of business, company gets taken over), so any closed source plugin can start to become unusable at very short notice. Open source is better, because its existence isn't at the mercy of commercial factors, but open source can still depend on proprietory platforms. (Related to this was the EOLAS patent issue. The big concern for W3C was that many historic web pages might become inaccessible because browsers withdrew support for features rather than pay royalties.)
Received on Sunday, 3 July 2005 08:23:09 UTC