- From: Mikko Rantalainen <mikko.rantalainen@peda.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:36:11 +0000
- To: www-style@w3.org
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Philip TAYLOR wrote: >>How does one abuse a "class" attribute, btw ? > > <div class="body"> ... </div> > <div class="important"> ... </div> > <p class="bullet"> ... </p> > <div class="item"> ... </div> > <span class="green"> ... </p> > <span class="invisible"> ... </span> > <a class="bannerLink" ...> ... </a> > <p class="small"> ... </p> > > ...etc. Basically, any time someone uses the class attribute for > presentational reasons ("bullet", "green", "invisible", "small"), and > any I agree with this. I think this is the very reason the style attribute should be removed -- class can be abused to behave to do the same thing. But let's not continue this way. > time someone uses the class attribute when HTML provides means to > provide the actual semantics ("body", "important", "item", > "bannerLink"). I don't agree with this. If I have a paragraph of text that is important then the only semantic markup HTML can provide me is <p><strong>Paragraph text here</strong><p> How do I now style such paragraph to have red border around it if not by using class "important" or "strong" for the p element? CSS doesn't have a way to select the p element that has child element strong. As a workaround I could use selector "p>strong" and set the style of strong element to undo the padding and margins of p element and then reapply the styles usually used for p in the strong and apply the border to strong element. But that's far from elegant solution. It's much simpler to just stick with class="important". It might be a slight abuse of class attribute but that's nothing compared to CSS hacks required! HTML doesn't allow me to write <strong><p></p></strong> event though all I really want is just an important paragraph. -- Mikko
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2005 15:33:59 UTC