- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:42:50 +0100
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: W3C CSS List <www-style@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> Ian Hickson wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> >>>> If the 'content' property in terms of CSS 3 UI really is the >>>> same as in CSS 2.1 only extended with a new value it should >>>> read "pseudo-element" not "(pseudo-)element"[1]. >>> >>> In CSS3, 'content' will apply to elements. >> >> css3-ui does not define that and does not depend on any module that >> defines that. (Like, for example, css3-content.) > > So? The clause is just making sure it doesn't contradict something > that it doesn't define. I don't understand the problem. Since css3-content is going to define a superset anyway (including 'icon', I suppose), why does css3-ui has to have such a sentence which may only lead to confusion for people who look into CSS 2.1 where it normatively refers to? -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Monday, 14 February 2005 12:43:02 UTC