- From: Noah Scales <noahjscales@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:50:17 -0800 (PST)
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Well, I'll use CSS to define my more meaningful tags as hypertext, hyperlinks included. I'll let devices interpret my custom mark-up just like they interpret XHTML. -Noah --- Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:27:25 +0100, Noah Scales > <noahjscales@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > You think that CSS doesn't give meaning to HTML, > that > > it just gives HTML mark-up display semantics. > Sure, in > > the same way that accompanying CSS styles my > custom > > hypertext mark-up. The only difference is that > > browsers have default CSS interpretations of the > > "meaning" of HTML coded into them. > > Not just that. CSS does not define what is a link > for example. It can > select a link. CSS does not have knowledge or > anything to say regarding > the language of the document. Regarding what is or > what is not a quote. > What is a header and what is not a header. Such > underlying semantics are > quite important for devices though. (Skipping > through > headers, letting the user know extra information > regarding the quote, > etc.) Such underlying semantics are only exposed > because devices have > knowledge about the elements and not because they > have knowledge about > their default style. > > Which is logical, as the default style might only be > applied for a > particular medium and not for all. CSS has always > been designed as an > optional styling language. > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > <http://annevankesteren.nl/> > <http://www.opera.com/> > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2005 21:50:26 UTC