Re: [CSS21] Wider variety of (non-junk) examples requested

> At this point I really don't know what you're asking for. I'll certainly
> be happy to go through the spec checking that each example has no syntax
> errors and so forth, but requests to "use more XML" and suggestions that
> three line examples of simple document fragments that could be cut and
> pasted into HTML documents with no problems should have DOCTYPEs seem to
> be unhelpful, as they would either require dangerous changes (in terms of
> potential introduction of errors) or would make the document more
> confusing to the very people the examples are aimed at.

Is there something that prevents you from adding links to figures that
include the full documents the fragments come from while leaving the
example text alone. This /would/ require minimal changes as it doesn't
affect the text around the example, just the example.

-- 

Orion Adrian

Received on Friday, 26 August 2005 22:25:21 UTC