- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 21:55:27 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Friday, August 26, 2005, 9:04:07 PM, Bjoern wrote: BH> * Chris Lilley wrote: >>>>Thank you. If the fragments are stated in the spec to be legal SGML Text >>>>Entities then that would be satisfactory, although I am only aware of >>>>one CSS-enabled browser that uses an SGML parser. >> >>BH> http://www.doczilla.com/ >> >>That is the one I was thinking of, yes. BH> There are several more then, there are various extensions that allow BH> "use" of SGML parsers in existing browsers, Epiphany for example has BH> an extension for validation based on OpenSP and Internet Explorer can BH> easily be extended to fully support that (which some people indeed BH> did), too, including SGML+CSS rendering. I also know of a project to BH> extend X-Smiles with such capability, but the project is not public BH> AFAICT. Not that it's relevant here... Right, if the intention is to test CSS2.1 using SGML examples rather than just XML ones then you only need two interoperable SGML+CSS implementations, although more is always better. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Friday, 26 August 2005 19:55:36 UTC