- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:31:32 -0500
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Chris Lilley wrote: > Its rather sad to see this sort of allergic reaction to the mere > suggestion of making something be conforming XML As far as I can see, the allergic reaction is to the suggestion of making changes to an example that require a lot of time investment to get right, have dubious benefit, and have a high probability of introducing errors in the spec. I have not seen much in the way of objections to adding XML examples in general (in addition to the HTML examples), insomuch as time permits. -Boris
Received on Friday, 26 August 2005 18:31:43 UTC