- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:04:50 +0200
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
* Chris Lilley wrote: >BH> So, in http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-WICD-20050809/ an "example" like > >BH> <html:a href="LargeMap.html"> >BH> <html:object type="image/svg+xml" data="child.svg"/> >BH> </html:a> > >BH> is, as you say, "junk" > >No; I asked (in the part you trimmed immediately after that quote) for a >minimal quality level (well formed or valid, depending on whether its >SGML or XML). That example meets the minimum (its well formed); Aha, okay, your "HTML 4 does not have a notion of well formedness or any lesser criterion than validity" is misleading then, the examples are legal SGML Text Entities which is a higher level of quality than "well-formed" as conformance to the document type and link type declarations are required of such entities. That's no conformance level of HTML4 though, just like "well-formed parsed entity" is no conformance level of XHTML. All XHTML and HTML4 conformance levels require a document type declaration. So it seems no change is required here, do you agree? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Friday, 26 August 2005 16:04:33 UTC