- From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:54:59 +0200
- To: Christian Roth <roth@visualclick.de>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Christian Roth schreef: > The only fear I have is that it will not change much for the situation: > Noone will stop you from modifying the Schema to your liking; so you > just reference your proprietary one in your CSS, and we have the same > interoperability problems we have now when throwing this "valid" CSS at > some implementation. > > Having standardized Schemas to be referenced, however, is nothing else > than having just a specific version declaration in the CSS (PUBLIC id in > DTD speak). > I think a nice example of a ‘proprietary’ schema which is aimed at the real-world support of CSS is Dreamweaver’s... When editing CSS, you can specify which browsers versions you want you stylesheet to work in, and Dreamweaver will validate the CSS on the fly and tell you which properties and selectors are not compatible. Of course, in practice this doesn’t exactly work a 100%, i.e. it marks properties as ‘invalid’ while you fully intend to write them, for several reasons. For one this schema is always a bit behind on the current browser situation, e.g. Dreamweaver 8 will be out soon, will they still have time to make schemas for IE7 and Firefox 1.5? Another thing is that when writing CSS, you often use something that doesn’t work in all browsers and give a fallback to the others (or a hack based on quirky behaviour which achieves the same). ~Grauw -- Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands. Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
Received on Friday, 26 August 2005 08:55:13 UTC