- From: Craig Northway <craign@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:16:54 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-style@w3.org
Hi, Ian Hickson wrote: >On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Craig Northway wrote: > > >>Perhaps a sentence such as. 'The following list of tokens that must be >>supported by conforming CSS User Agents.' Isn't this section defining >>the CSS syntax? >> >>Certainly the syntax definition further down this section requires a >>conformance statement for instance replacing 'Below is the core syntax >>for CSS' with 'Below is the core syntax for CSS that conforming CSS 2.1 >>User Agents must support'. >> >> > >It is not clear to me why the "must" statement to this effect in section >3.2 is not enough here. Could you clarify your request? > > I would a better indication of the sections of the specification that are mandatory, recommended and optional. As per the QA Framework: Specification Guidelines (http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-qaframe-spec-20050817) Requirement 8. Regards, Craig Northway
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 14:17:03 UTC