- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:44:06 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
Hello , This comment is sent from both the CDF WG and the SVG WG. Thus, while it is not the case that a CSS2 stylesheet is necessarily forwards-compatible with CSS 2.1, it is the case that a stylesheet restricting itself to CSS 2.1 features is more likely to find a compliant user agent today and to preserve forwards compatibility in the future. While breaking forward compatibility is not desirable, we believe the advantages to the revisions in CSS 2.1 are worthwhile. http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CSS21-20050613/about.html#q1 Experience with the CSS validator shows that the lack of version identification is a significant problem for managing CSS content; there is no way to indicate to which of the multiple, changing, overlapping versions of CSS the stye sheet is attempting to comply. As the quoted section illustrates, there are incompatibilities between versions. The SVG WG requests that CSS 2.1 align itself with the Architecture of the World Wide Web A data format specification SHOULD provide for version information. http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#ext-version As an example, @version 2.1; would be one method. Unknown at-rules are ignored by compliant parsers. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 13:44:18 UTC