- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:27:39 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Craig Northway <craign@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-style@w3.org
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Craig Northway wrote: > > > > that might well be so but that's not the case at the moment. CSS is > > more commonly used with HTML than with XHTML documents, it therefore > > makes sense to include HTML examples in the CSS specifications. > > Aren't valid xhtml documents valid html documents? (in general). Oh, no, not by a long shot. It is in fact impossible to create a document that is valid both HTML and XHTML, and very hard to get even close with any non-trivial use of XHTML. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 13:27:52 UTC