- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:47:03 +0200
- To: craign@cisra.canon.com.au
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
* Craig Northway wrote: >Section 5.9 > >Why doesn't this section mention xml:id? Actually, it does mention xml:id. >Why is XML1.0 referenced instead of XML1.1? SVG 1.2 for instance >references XML 1.1. Please reference XML 1.1. There is no difference between XML 1.0 and XML 1.1 for the particular informative note, referring to XML 1.1 instead of 1.0 would confuse readers who might assume that it's not relevant for XML 1.0 and there does not seem to be a good reason to mention both. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 12:46:47 UTC