- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 23:00:55 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > Quoting Brad Fults <bfults@gmail.com>: > >> I saw that right after I sent my last email. >> >> So now the question becomes: what does "evaluated" mean? Were the contents >> of the previous draft flawed in some way? > > The previous draft of the CSS 3 Text Module had several issues that have been > pointed out by fantasai on the www-style mailing list after which she became > an invited expert to work on the draft. > > At a guess I think she just did not get around checking those properties and > specifying them before the new draft was released. Or rather, I decided to release a new draft before completing everything since it's best, imho, to get feedback on existing parts sooner rather than later. Maybe I should have added a few exclamation points to the Status heading or something... > I certainly hope text-overflow:ellipsis will be added back which has already > one implementation and is quite useful. It will certainly be added back in, with some changes based on Dave Hyatt's feedback from the previous CR. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 03:02:29 UTC