- From: Ron van den Boogaard <ron@ronvdb.com>
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 00:51:51 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
> >You have not read my proposal and the reason behind it correctly. You seem >to ignore the accessibility aspect of it, when the image turns of the >images or the image is loaded with latency. Please read the older posts. I read the older posts , Rest assured. I don't think standards should be bothered with latency or not. What we do need is as clean and as simple a mark-up as possible. Latency on images have more to do with band-width, server anomalies and UA imperfections. The code should not provide work-arounds for these things. > >We urgently, and most definitely need such a feature, so UA's could >embrace it ASAP. Good thing is you'd be free not to use that feature. > >-- >Emrah BASKAYA >www.hesido.com > -- http://www.tango42.com Nieuw, Frisser, Leuker, Tikkie brutaler. Dating
Received on Saturday, 13 August 2005 22:52:01 UTC