Re: Conclusion for :read-only and :read-write? from Daniel Glazman on 2005-08-10 (www-style@w3.org from August 2005)

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:54:38 +0200
To: www-style@w3.org
Cc: Allan Beaufour <abeaufour@novell.com>
Message-ID: <42FA5B7E.108@disruptive-innovations.com>

Matthew Raymond wrote:

>    With regards to Daniel Glazman's weblog post:
> 
> http://glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/index.php?2005/08/04/1148-read-write-and-read-only
> 
>    I guess I'm for Solution 3, with some Solution 1 mixed in. A way to
> style stuff in various editing contexts is nice, but it shouldn't have
> anything to do with semantic read-only/read-write states.

Solution 3 just implies that a browser cannot be used as the ground
basis for an editor. With my Nvu hat on, I cannot second that choice...

</Daniel>

Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2005 19:53:39 UTC