- From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:06:32 +0200
- To: David R <david@davidr.co.uk>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
It is already in the specification.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-css3-box-20021024/#the-overflow-x
I believe Mozilla even implemented it recently.
~Grauw
David R wrote:
> Proposal:
>
>
>
> ’d like to prose the addition of Trident’s “Overflow-x” and
> “Overflow-y” CSS extensions to the CSS3 Draft spec, or adjust the
> existing "overflow" property.
>
>
>
> Justification clause:
>
>
>
> When using "overflow: auto;" or "overflow: scroll;" on an element
> with content that does not fit in the width of the element, nearly all
> browsers include the horizontal scrollar inside the box of the element
> the property was applied on. This will cause the element to have a
> vertical scrollbar as well, even when one is not normally needed (nor
> desired).
>
>
>
> Syntax:
>
>
>
> New properties:
>
>
>
> Enum "overflowType" { auto | hidden | scroll | visible }
>
>
>
> overflow-y: overflowType
>
> overflow-x: overflowType
>
>
>
> Proposed change to existing "overflow" property:
>
>
>
> Entire element:
>
>
>
> overflow: overflowType;
>
>
>
> X and Y axis respectively:
>
>
>
> overflow: overflowType overflowType;
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> -David R
>
--
Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!!
Received on Sunday, 24 April 2005 19:06:34 UTC