- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:40:13 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
Bert Bos wrote: > On Thursday 14 April 2005 08:58, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >>Matthew Jaggard wrote: >> >>>I have been looking through the CSS2.1 and found that it will not >>>do what I am currently wanting (unless I'm blind and/or stupid). >>>What I want is to make the text in my document fill the screen (I'm >>>using the projection media type at the moment) so if I just have 1 >>>letter, it would be huge and if I had a whole essay, it would be >>>tiny, etc. It would be useful to be able to specify a maximum and >>>minimum font size too and whether it fills the whole page or just >>>does it by one line of text. > > It would only resize the text to fill a horizontal space (one line). > There is currently no plan to fill a given vertical space. That is more > difficult and less often used. Instead, you can put the text in an SVG > file and scale that. That wouldn't reflow the text, but it is probably > close enough. Actually, I feel that vertical scaling -- even if it has to involve some JavaScript -- is critical for making XHTML+CSS in presentation mode an acceptable substitute for PowerPoint. (I say this from experience, having just used Opera's presentation mode for my talk at the IUC27. I'm not sure I want to try that again, it was very time-consuming.) > But these are long-term plans. Don't expect either vh/vw or > min/max-font-size to be fully specified, let alone implemented, within > the next twelve months. (Of course, if somebody likes them, implements > them experimentally in some browser and writes up precisely what they > do, that may speed things up.) I think text-align-last: size would be harder to specify and implement than vh/vw. I really look forward to being able to use vh/vw. :) ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 15 April 2005 20:41:38 UTC