- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:53:59 +0200
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
fantasai wrote: > CSS3 Backgrounds also depends directly on CSS3 Color and CSS3 Values and > Units. We are using the CSS3 Color <color> type and the CSS3 Values and > Units <length>, <percentage>, and <url>. A dependency on CSS2.1, as Anne > suggests, would preclude using new features defined only in CSS3. So when you implement the CSS Background module using CSS2.1 <color>, <length>, <percentage> and <uri> you are non-conforming? I think that should be made more explicit. >> Something like >> >> background-position: NW 0% 0%, SE -5px -5px >> >> to put the first image in the top left (northwest) corner and the >> second a little inside the bottom right (southeast) corner? > > I think introducing another coordinate naming system when we already > have one that means the same thing is a bad idea. TL/TR/BL/BR matches > the rest of CSS much better. Agreed. (Or just name them 'top-left', 'top-right', etc. to be even more consistent.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2005 06:53:53 UTC