- From: Kelly Miller <lightsolphoenix@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:07:36 -0400
- To: W3C CSS List <www-style@w3.org>
I've always held the opinion since I read the specification that really, background-repeat should be renamed something else, and contain values that allow stretching, tiling and rounding on both, and then have background-size used with background-position to determine how big the background image should be displayed as. After all, the specification calls for multiple backgrounds, but they aren't likely to be useful at this point because there's no way to control the total size of an image (as far as I can see) outside of the intrinsic dimensions. -- http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ - Get Firefox! http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ - Reclaim Your Inbox!
Received on Saturday, 9 April 2005 19:07:35 UTC