- From: Ben Ward <benmward@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:43:38 +0100
- To: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Apr 4, 2005 8:16 PM, Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl> wrote: > > Browser sniffing is the BAD solution, which unfortunately is sometimes > necessary. What I mean with this is, with browser sniffing, you create > code with loads of hacks for IE6, but when IE7 is released, there is no > way to tell what it will support. So either you check for IE6 and IE7 is > fed your 'standards compliance' version which will probably still not > work, or you check for IE in general (although history tells us that > each version requires different hacks) and IE7 is fed the hacks for IE6 > and misrenders things as well. For all those who do look at browser sniffing as a necessary evil, keep in mind that "!required" (or any of the close relative proposals) would allow you to do this as a hack. If you desperately needed to apply a style only to IE, just mark an IE only CSS property as !required. Similarly if you're hacking around a mozilla bug, mark as !required any of the -moz- extensions (and so on for -o-, -khtml-, -apple- and so forth). Again, I'd like having blocks of style rules since /if/ something terrible happened and I did need to do a big block of correction for Browser X, I could put those corrective styles into a @group { }, then "!require" a proprietry property in the first style only ("-browserx-dancing-monkeys: #00F !required") and write the rest of the styles in that group without bloat/pollution, still knowing that they'll only be applied to Browser X. As most here can probably tell, I'm really rather keen on !required, but I don't want to repeat myself over and over. I fear many are looking in their inbox thinking "Oh God, not again", so I'll refrain from any more. I do think that the "Browser Sniffing" last resort is comfortably covered by a syntax which works with a more "embrace new CSS" intent, rather than a purely "fix-faulty-browser" one. -- http://www.ben-ward.co.uk
Received on Monday, 4 April 2005 20:43:42 UTC