- From: Benjamin D. Smedberg <bsmedberg@covad.net>
- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:11:01 -0400
- To: daniel.pelsmaeker@zonnet.nl
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Daniël Pelsmaeker wrote:
> It almost looks like a 'feature selector'. And it doesn't specify a way to
> determine whether a CSS3 module is implemented or a CSS2 specification part.
It is a feature selector.
> I certainly like the idea, but I would go for specifying the modules and
> specifications that are required for the rule blocks instead. For example:
>
> @supported [ CSS3-Color; ] { #myel { color: blue; } }
I don't think that named modules is great idea. Incremental support for
CSS has been the rule for years, and I don't think that the situation is
going to change much in the future. Mozilla already has support for
opacity: but does not, to the best of my knowledge, support RGBA color
values. Besides, how would you detect support for vendor-specific
properties like -moz-binding or the Ms behavior property?
--BDS
Received on Friday, 17 September 2004 18:11:07 UTC