- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 09:01:04 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Antoine Quint <ml@graougraou.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Antoine Quint wrote: > > The SVG Working Group is currently looking at the focus navigation > properties in CSS UI, and specifically the four properties described in > section 10.2.2 of the CR document [0]. The properties look fine except > for the syntax used to reference ids. The spec says you should use the > straight # syntax (ie. nav-up: #Top) as opposed to using the url() > syntax (ie. nav-up: url(#Top). Is this an oversight or a deliberate > decision? Thanks for any clarification, It's intentional. url(#top) would be a fragment identifier in the stylesheet, and url(foo.html#top) would mean that nav-up could define any links, which we specifically set out not to address, since that would be a semantic not a style. HTH, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2004 09:01:06 UTC