- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 16:20:38 +0200
- To: Matthew.van.Eerde@hbinc.com
- Cc: ian@hixie.ch, thebrunger@yahoo.com, www-style@w3.org, Bert.Bos@sophia.inria.fr
On Thursday, September 2, 2004, 5:58:04 PM, Matthew wrote: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#rgba-color >> >> Already supported by Safari. MvEhc> On that note: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#numerical says MvEhc> "transparent" is short for rgba(0, 0, 0, 0). Wouldn't it be better to MvEhc> say it's short for rgba(255, 255, 255, 0)? No - transparent is better as transparent black - no color and no coverage. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group
Received on Friday, 3 September 2004 14:20:40 UTC