- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:22:01 +0000 (UTC)
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, David Woolley wrote: > > This document seems to be in limbo. It's clearly abandoned, but is not > listed on the master list of technical reports <http://www.w3.org/TR/>, It's listed in the "Working Drafts in development" section. > even in the "Working Drafts no longer in development" section, and it > hasn't been revised to meet the condition that: > > The latest version of each of these documents should be an epilogue > for the document. > > That applies to that category. XBL2 will mostly supercede BECSS. sXBL, the baby version of XBL2, doesn't quite reach far enough to do so though, so BECSS is not yet obsolete in concept. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 23 October 2004 16:22:03 UTC