Re: Possible CSS2/CSS2.1/CSS3 spec error in @media from Christian Roth on 2004-10-08 (www-style@w3.org from October 2004)

From: Christian Roth <roth@visualclick.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 09:48:15 +0200
To: "www-style Mailing List" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20041008084815.25469@mail.visualclick.de>

Jukka K. Korpela wrote:

>The formulation is vague - not exactly the kind of language we should
>expect from _specifications_. I'm referring to the word "unrecognized".

So I'm not the only one who was problems with the wording of the spec for
this very problem.

See my post on the very same issue a few weeks ago (my case #3):

<http://www.w3.org/mid/20040903155700.3541@mail.visualclick.de>

and Ian Hickson's response to the wording issue:

<http://www.w3.org/mid/Pine.LNX.4.61.0409041120230.9548@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

...which suggests that this passage will be rewritten and clarified until
CSS 2.1 CR and of course be updated in css3-syntax.

Regards, Christian.

Received on Friday, 8 October 2004 07:48:53 UTC