- From: Staffan Måhlén <staffan.mahlen@comhem.se>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 21:17:30 +0100
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Ok, so the multi-backgrounds cannot be controlled the way an element or a pseudo-
element can and only the background-XX properties are "arrayed" then?
Is the effect that they allow important enough to justify introducing a special new type of
arrayed properties?
/Staffan
On 30 Nov 2004 at 13:43, fantasai wrote:
>
> Staffan Måhlén wrote:
> > On 28 Oct 2004 at 10:51, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> >
> >>>Given the following hypothetical CSS3:
> >>>
> >>>body { background: url(foo) url(bar); }
> >>>
> >>>Which background is painted on the bottom, and which is painted on the top?
> >
> > I would probably first ask: how will an author set say size or opacity of one of those
> > background-images?
>
> I'll go with the example of repeat, since that property already exists
> since CSS1. :)
>
> background: url(foo) repeat-y, url(bar) no-repeat;
>
> or
>
> background-image: url(foo), url(bar);
> background-repeat: repeat-y, no-repeat;
>
> ~fantasai
>
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2004 20:18:03 UTC