- From: by way of Bert Bos <w3@lahf.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:47:21 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
I notice that only 3 possibilites are given. I would like to assume a fourth, but based on characteristics already found in existing CSS capability, for instance the north east south west of margins or padding:north east south west; would be a good start, but if I would like to use layers, and so make things a little more complicated, and could actually make these layers transparent, things would get a lot more interesting but complicated. Going back to the nesw, if I could do background url(n) url(e) url(s) url(w) for all pics or background url() url(e) url() url(w); for pics on the left and right, I would be happy. If I could have background url() url(e) url() url(w);background-z-layer e:1 w:0; so that the right picture was layered above the left one, I'd be happier, and I would be ecstatic, if I could get background url() url(e) url() url(w);background-z-layer e:1 w:0; background-layer-padding and background-layer-margin to work so that my picture could be offset, or basically if I could get a cool way of placing those pictures relative to the page, but also some distance from the left or top anchor points. Forgive this last point if it sounds fuzzy, I didn't really think this one through yet. Hal -- -- No Spam solicited, from you or by you, Thanks. -- ---Virus checked by sender - There are no viruses attached to this email.---
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2004 16:47:23 UTC