- From: W. Leon Sutton, Jr. <wsuttonjr@hyponiqs.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:51:02 -0500
- To: <ben@ben-ward.co.uk>, <www-style@w3.org>
Ben Ward's words: > >Another possible method for determining stacking order that I can > >think of off the top of my head would be to use something like > >background(1): url(image1.jpg); background(2): url(image2.jpg); > > The above would be my favoured method of representing multiple > backgrounds too. > I was going to submit such a suggestion myself a few weeks ago but > feared I was too late (and being new to www-style...). Anyway, since > it's come up, this was my theory: What about "background: 0([background-image] [background-position] ... [background-xxx]) 1([background-image] [background-position] ... [background-xxx]);"? That could work, too. I personally believe that background(0): url(blah.jpg); background(1): url(blah.jpg); would be more benificial and easier to understand, but the above might also be a strong possibility. I suppose it would depend on the author of that particular style sheet. Thanks, W. Leon Sutton, Jr. Hyponiq's Web Development Solutions - www.hyponiqs.com
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2004 13:51:36 UTC