- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:56:12 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, www-style@w3.org
Since this thread is now about CSS and not SVG, I have shunted it over to www-style. It comes from www-svg originally. On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Chris Lilley wrote: >> >> This is handled in the CSS2.0 errata [1], which agree with CSS2.1. So >> there's no ambiguity at this point, as far as I can see. > > Once they become normative, which is done by publishing a second > edition; which the CSS WG does not plan to do since CSS 2.1 is the > replacement, so CSS2 is abandoned. Hence the problem. CSS2.1 _is_ the second edition. That's what the ".1" bit means. It's short for "CSS Level 2 Revision 1". This is quite clearly stated right at the top of the spec: # Cascading Style Sheets, level 2 revision 1 # CSS 2.1 Specification -- http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/ -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 18 November 2004 22:56:15 UTC