- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@iinet.net.au>
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 19:33:40 +1100
- To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- CC: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > background-repeat:expand; /* or -h-smile-expand, whatever you like */ See 'background-size' [1]. eg. background-size: 100% 100%; That, I think, would look identical to your expand value, is far more sensible, and it is being defined in the CSS3 backgrounds module. Though, if you're going to implement that, then it should also use a vendor prefix, at least until the module becomes a candidate recommendation and implementations are called for. That is to avoid a situation where your implementation becomes non-conformant when the spec changes. The vendor prefix should not be optional on any proprietary extensions you implement, at least until such properties are defined a CSS recommendation, and, ideally, have been implemented correctly according to their definition. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#background-size0 -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/ http://GetFirefox.com/ Rediscover the Web http://SpreadFirefox.com/ Igniting the Web
Received on Monday, 15 November 2004 08:34:22 UTC